Authors/Presenters and Affiliations
Yunming Zhang (MIT)
Mengjiao Yang (MIT)
Riyadh Baghdadi (MIT)
Shoaib Kamil (MIT)
Julian Shun (MIT)
Saman Amarasinghe (MIT)
Conference Abbrev.
OOPSLA
Abstract

Writing high-performance graph applications is hard. The performance bottlenecks of graph applications depend not only on the algorithm and the underlying hardware, but also on the size and structure of the input graph. As a result, programmers must try different combinations of a large set of techniques, which make tradeoffs among locality, work-efficiency, and parallelism, to develop the best implementation for a specific algorithm and type of graph. Existing graph frameworks and domain specific languages (DSLs) lack flexibility, supporting only a limited set of optimizations.

This paper introduces GraphIt, a new DSL for graph computations that generates fast implementations for algorithms with different performance characteristics running on graphs with different sizes and structures. Graphit separates what is computed (algorithm) from how it is computed (schedule). Programmers specify the algorithm using an algorithm language, and performance optimizations are specified using a separate scheduling language. The algorithm language simplifies the expression of the algorithms, while exposing opportunities for optimizations. We formulate graph optimizations, including edge traversal direction, data layout, parallelization, cache, and NUMA optimizations, as tradeoffs among locality, parallelism, and work-efficiency. The scheduling language enables programmers to easily search through this complicated tradeoff space by composing together a large set of edge traversal and vertex data layout optimizations. The compiler uses a new scheduling representation, the graph iteration space, to model, compose, and ensure the validity of the large number of optimizations. We evaluate Graphit's performance with six algorithms on graphs with different structures and sizes. Graphit outperforms the next fastest of six state-of-the-art shared-memory frameworks (Ligra, Green-Marl, GraphMat, Galois, Gemini, and Grazelle) on 22 out of 27 experiments by up to 4.8x, and is never more than 40% slower than the fastest framework on the other experiments. Graphit also reduces the lines of code by up to an order of magnitude compared to the next fastest framework.

SRC Publication Number
P093870
Is this paper a draft or the final version?
Final Version
Have You Previously Submitted a version of this publication to adacenter.org/SRC? If yes, please provide the publication ID.
no
By submitting this document, you authorize SRC to post it on our secured, non-public website.
Off

Please log in to view this page

Content on this page is restricted to ADA researchers and sponsors. Please log in or register for a user account.

 

X